Analyzing Misunderstanding in Communication Essay

I. Introduction1.1 Background in that location argon many things to do when students atomic number 18 having time together with their fri kiboshs. They nookie allocate aspects and feelings with each separate or reason homework, lessons and so forth. Topics get out flow course when comfortable z single in the confabulation shake off been reached. Those atomic number 18 any(prenominal) of evidences which generate that people communicate with others.Communication is an transfigure of ideas, knowledge, and so forthtera between individuals by exploitation dustup in which all parties infer the language they use. Communication certainly involves more(prenominal) than one person, which means that there are more than one thought obscure in the converse because everyone has different backgrounds, experiences, etc. There are 2 positions in dialogue, they are as a transmitter and as receiver and they will bring forth turn to these positions. All communication has two part s a sender and a receiver. The sender has a message he or she intends to transmit, and s/he puts it in words, which, to her/him, best reflect what s/he is thinking. But many things backside interact to prevent the intended message from universe received accurately. (Burgess, 2013).Read more different reasons wherefore people communicate endeavorMis apprehendings sometimes occur in this convert of ideas in communication. The receiver hears besides he does not listen. He does not usurp the points being made. It may because the receiver does not focus on what the sender or speaker has give tongue to. a few construes are language-related, the source of many of the misapprehends apprize be traced to ambiguity in the speakers utterances. Other reasons for mis thought include mishearing and wishing of world knowledge, namely, factors that also contribute to mistake in intracultural communication., (Kaur 2011). There are some other factors which we will visit that can cause be amiss in communication if we tumble our experiences in having communication with others.1.2 blueprint of writingThe purposes of this writing area) To key out out the factors cause misunderstanding in communication, especially in the intercourse which will be shown by the writer in the retrospective selective information section.b) To show what students commonly twaddle somewhat when they are congregation with their friends.II. Retrospective DataEveryone certainly has see misunderstanding when have communication with others friends, relatives, teachers, etc. misunderstanding not only occurs in communication involving different languages, cultures, etc. the great unwashed communicate with other who has the same language can also experience misunderstanding in which. It happened to me, I communicated with my friends by exploitation same language but I quiesce have misunderstanding in the communication. Thus, in this paper, I try to decompose misunderstanding in commun ication that I have experienced with my friends.At that time, we were termination to wanton away ride ( brace) while talk of the town about the modish Korean movie. Everyone already had their accounts that had been dealt. There three players in this game, namely, I, Ima and Anthi. Ima Apa film korea terbaru sekarang teman-teman? (what is the latest Korean movie, guys?) I and Anthi Emergency CoupleIma Iiih mau (Can I have the copy?)Anthi Bagus tau Maa (It is really amazing, Maa)I Iya bener hyphen Maa (Shes true, Maa)Ima Siapa main? (Who is the cast?)I Yang punya angka 3 keriting sih (Who has the 3-kinky card of course play scratch line) They both looked at me and laughed. I thought for a moment about why they laughed at me and I just motivation a few minutes to understand why they did it. I Oooh.. (I see)I and Anthi Ji Hyo yang maiiin ( Ji Hyo is main character/ one of the casts)III. Analysis/DiscussionCommunication is a complex humane activity that is prospering most o f the time. This, however, does not mean that understanding is granted or that it is always the case. Misunderstanding is a regular non-extraordinary feature of human fundamental interaction, whether communicative interaction is cross-cultural or not (Dascal 1985 Brown 1995 in BOU-FRANCH, Patricia (2002)).The info is one of examples which shows that the misunderstanding could still outlive even all the parties in the communication have the same culture, language and age. The misunderstanding is happened when I said Yang punya angka 3 keriting sih (Who has the 3-kinky card of course play first). I said that because I thought my friend, Ima, asked who played first or who had turn to start the game. I thought in that way because at that time I had just luck my card and had ready to start performing the game and because I had the 3-kinky card. What is the importance of having the 3-kinky card? The rule of playing Jenderal using bridge card in Indonesia, particularly in Lombok, is the one who plays first is the person who has the 3-kinky card.If we analyze the data more deeply, we will find that misunderstanding in the communication happened because I did not focus on the conversation when Ima asked, Siapa main? (Who is the cast?. I still focus on what we were talking about at the first talk but for the next I did not. It was not caused by insufficiency of world knowledge because we can see from the conversation that at the end I understood or accept that I had misunderstanding then I fixed it.IV. ConclusionIn conclusion, misunderstanding is a common thing that can happen in whether communicative interaction is cross-cultural or not. Misunderstanding caused by many factors such as ambiguity in the speakers utterances, lack of world knowledge, mishearing, etc. The data shows that the other factor that can cause misunderstanding in communication is being not focus on the conversation. Besides that, the data also shows one of what students usually talk about when they are gathering with their friends is the latest movie.V. ReferencesBOU-FRANCH, Patricia (2002) Misunderstandings and Unofficial Knowledge in institutional Discourse, in David Walton & Dagmar Scheu (eds) Culture and queen Ac(unofficially)knowledging Cultural Studies in Spain, Bern motherfucker Lang. (pp. 323-341)Burgess, Heidi. Misunderstandings. Beyond Intractability. Eds. Guy Burgess and Heidi Burgess. affair Information Consortium, University of Colorado, Boulder. Posted September 2003 . sKaur, Jagdish. Intercultural Pragmatics. Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 93116, ISSN (Online) 1613-365X, ISSN (Print) 1612-295X, inside 10.1515/IPRG.2011.004, February 2011